<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>appoulsen.dk &#187; truth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.appoulsen.dk/tag/truth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.appoulsen.dk</link>
	<description>It takes 2.0 to tango!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:18:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Truth be told &#8211; regardless?</title>
		<link>http://www.appoulsen.dk/2006/10/04/truth-be-told-regardless/</link>
		<comments>http://www.appoulsen.dk/2006/10/04/truth-be-told-regardless/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 15:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>appoulsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog-policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[truth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appoulsen.dk/2006/10/04/truth-be-told-regardless/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When dealing with the press you inevitably get misunderstood or misquoted at some point. It is not always intentional, but when the misunderstanding puts you in a bad light, what do you do? Well, you&#8217;re quick to get on the horn to the journo and correct the mistake, that&#8217;s for damn sure &#8211; and if [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When dealing with the press you inevitably get misunderstood or misquoted at some point.  It is not always intentional, but when the misunderstanding puts you in a bad light, what do you do?</p>
<p>Well, you&#8217;re quick to get on the horn to the journo and correct the mistake, that&#8217;s for damn sure &#8211;  and if your company has a blog you probably correct the mistake there as well &#8211; heck, you may even retaliate, and say a few nasty truths about the journo, or the paper he or she works at.</p>
<p>But what if the mistake puts you in a better light than you actually deserve? what if a number is wrong, but it looks good? What if you really didn&#8217;t say what it says you said, but you actually kinda wish you did?</p>
<p>Well, in my opinion &#8211; if you want to keep ANY kind of credibility as a bloggin&#8217; company, it&#8217;s in your best interest to be truthful. Blog the interview, and admit that the correct number was actually not quite that impressive, or what you really said was this and that &#8211; even though the quote sounds better.</p>
<p>Why, you ask? Why not just relish in the good fortune that came your way?</p>
<p>Well, because the truth has a nasty habit of surfacing at some point, and when it does you&#8217;re royally screwed if you havent told it from the get go &#8211; and the next time you attempt to use your blog to correct a mistake, or give a more nuanced picture of an interview, or some stuff like that, who&#8217;s going to believe you &#8211; honestly&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.appoulsen.dk/2006/10/04/truth-be-told-regardless/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

