<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>appoulsen.dk &#187; sexy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.appoulsen.dk/tag/sexy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.appoulsen.dk</link>
	<description>It takes 2.0 to tango!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:18:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Feedreader overload</title>
		<link>http://www.appoulsen.dk/2007/01/10/feedreader-overload/</link>
		<comments>http://www.appoulsen.dk/2007/01/10/feedreader-overload/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>appoulsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UMTS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appoulsen.dk/2007/01/10/feedreader-overload/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MAN, my feedreader suffered after yesterday&#8217;s Steve Jobs&#8217; keynote at Macworld Expo 2007! And MAN, do I want that iPhone But what&#8217;s up with not making the iPhone UMTS or HSDPA enabled? Edge just doesn&#8217;t cut it, speed-wise&#8230;Nokia seem to agree with me, but then again &#8211; you&#8217;d kinda expect them to, right? Anyway, it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MAN, my feedreader suffered after yesterday&#8217;s Steve Jobs&#8217; keynote at Macworld Expo 2007!</p>
<p>And MAN, do I want that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/the-apple-iphone/">iPhone</a></p>
<p><img width="301" height="200" border="0" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/01/apple-iphone.jpg" /></p>
<p>But what&#8217;s up with not making the iPhone UMTS or HSDPA enabled? Edge just doesn&#8217;t cut it, speed-wise&#8230;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/nokia-on-iphone-what-no-3g/">Nokia seem to agree with me</a>, but then again &#8211; you&#8217;d kinda expect them to, right?</p>
<p>Anyway, it looks dead sexy, and I like the fact that it runs  OSX software.</p>
<p>Next thing I&#8217;m looking forward to know more about is the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/04/mac-tablet-at-macworld-its-not-what-you-think/">Modbook</a> &#8211; the first ever Mac tablet&#8230;. oh, I hope it&#8217;s nice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.appoulsen.dk/2007/01/10/feedreader-overload/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Apple over Microsoft?</title>
		<link>http://www.appoulsen.dk/2007/01/09/why-mac-over-ms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.appoulsen.dk/2007/01/09/why-mac-over-ms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 06:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>appoulsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appoulsen.dk/2007/01/09/why-mac-over-ms/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over at hovedetpaabloggen Trine-Marie poses an interesting question (in Danish). Why do we find Apple &#8216;sexy&#8217; and Microsoft &#8216;dorky&#8217;? Is it all in the advertising? Have we really &#8211; and completely without critical distance &#8211; bought in to the desire to &#8216;be a Mac&#8217;? It becomes especially interesting, when you look at MS and Apple&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over at <a target="_blank" href="http://www.hovedetpaabloggen.dk/2007/01/09/hvorfor-er-apple-sexet-mens-microsoft-er-kikset/">hovedetpaabloggen</a> Trine-Marie poses an interesting question (in Danish). Why do we find Apple &#8216;sexy&#8217; and Microsoft &#8216;dorky&#8217;? Is it all in the advertising? Have we really &#8211; and completely without critical distance &#8211; bought in to the desire to &#8216;be a Mac&#8217;?</p>
<p>It becomes especially interesting, when you look at MS and Apple&#8217;s so very different communication strategies. MS are open about development, they blog, they test, and they pay attention to what their users request. Apple seem to take some (educated) stabs at what users request, and then keep them under lock and key until they are good and ready to communicate them.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m torn. I would love for Apple to be more open in their communication and involve their users much more in the development of products, but personally, I&#8217;m completely in love with my Mac. I think it&#8217;s the best computer I&#8217;ve ever worked on. Hands down. But why? First of all, I really like the fact that it looks good, and it &#8216;feels&#8217; good (know what I mean?) but to me, it&#8217;s also a question of what&#8217;s inside. The software just suits me better. The UI, the apps, the ease with which I navigate between work and play &#8211; music, pictures, integration with web services, all packaged really nicely and yes, it IS more stable than any PC I&#8217;ve ever worked on.</p>
<p>One huge added bonus (and the reason I went mac when I did) is the fact that I can run fully functional Windows software using <a target="_blank" href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/bootcamp/">Bootcamp</a> or <a target="_blank" href="http://www.parallels.com/">Parallels</a> (tried both &#8211; settled on parallels, cause I don&#8217;t have to reboot to switch between systems).</p>
<p>But when talking about apple&#8217;s success, one factor stands out over all the rest &#8211; the almighty Ipod! Were it not for Apple&#8217;s MONSTER of a DAP, I doubt that they would have been able to reach customers outside of their original target audience (creatives).</p>
<p>The Ipod is still at the very foundation of Apple&#8217;s succes, and although they try to position their computers and have them appeal to a broader audience, the Ipod is still the breadwinner of the Apple family &#8211; and probably will be for a long time to come.</p>
<p>But this sheep of a Mac-user will be following <a target="_blank" href="http://www.macworldexpo.com/live/20/">developments at the Expo</a> very closely for the next four days, hoping for really sexy stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.appoulsen.dk/2007/01/09/why-mac-over-ms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

