<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Corporate blogging renamed?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.appoulsen.dk/2006/12/16/corporate-blogging-renamed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.appoulsen.dk/2006/12/16/corporate-blogging-renamed/</link>
	<description>It takes 2.0 to tango!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 08:00:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Claudette</title>
		<link>http://www.appoulsen.dk/2006/12/16/corporate-blogging-renamed/comment-page-1/#comment-2536</link>
		<dc:creator>Claudette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 12:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appoulsen.dk/2006/12/16/corporate-blogging-renamed/#comment-2536</guid>
		<description>ERR s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ERR s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valerie</title>
		<link>http://www.appoulsen.dk/2006/12/16/corporate-blogging-renamed/comment-page-1/#comment-2531</link>
		<dc:creator>Valerie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 02:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appoulsen.dk/2006/12/16/corporate-blogging-renamed/#comment-2531</guid>
		<description>Bad news</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bad news</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Established media continue pay-per-post discussion &#124; appoulsen.dk</title>
		<link>http://www.appoulsen.dk/2006/12/16/corporate-blogging-renamed/comment-page-1/#comment-1979</link>
		<dc:creator>Established media continue pay-per-post discussion &#124; appoulsen.dk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 09:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appoulsen.dk/2006/12/16/corporate-blogging-renamed/#comment-1979</guid>
		<description>[...] BTW, I still believe that the only sensitive way for companies to spend money on blogs is to allocate ressources [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BTW, I still believe that the only sensitive way for companies to spend money on blogs is to allocate ressources [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The employee blog as a recruitment instrument &#124; appoulsen.dk</title>
		<link>http://www.appoulsen.dk/2006/12/16/corporate-blogging-renamed/comment-page-1/#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator>The employee blog as a recruitment instrument &#124; appoulsen.dk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 19:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appoulsen.dk/2006/12/16/corporate-blogging-renamed/#comment-413</guid>
		<description>[...] &#171; &#171; Corporate blogging renamed? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &laquo; &laquo; Corporate blogging renamed? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hovedetpaabloggen.dk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Julekalender - 15. december - virksomheder blogger ikke - medarbejdere blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.appoulsen.dk/2006/12/16/corporate-blogging-renamed/comment-page-1/#comment-395</link>
		<dc:creator>hovedetpaabloggen.dk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Julekalender - 15. december - virksomheder blogger ikke - medarbejdere blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 17:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appoulsen.dk/2006/12/16/corporate-blogging-renamed/#comment-395</guid>
		<description>[...] AsbjÃ¸rn Poulsen foreslÃ¥r derfor, at vi afliver udtrykket &#8220;corporate blogging&#8221; og i stedet begynder at tale om &#8220;medarbejder-blogging&#8221;: If a blog in a corporate context is to leave ANY impact, it needs to bear the voice of the individual employees who post to it. Otherwise it loses credibility and becomes boring as heck. No one wants to read a boring blog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AsbjÃ¸rn Poulsen foreslÃ¥r derfor, at vi afliver udtrykket &#8220;corporate blogging&#8221; og i stedet begynder at tale om &#8220;medarbejder-blogging&#8221;: If a blog in a corporate context is to leave ANY impact, it needs to bear the voice of the individual employees who post to it. Otherwise it loses credibility and becomes boring as heck. No one wants to read a boring blog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

